Amazon DEA-C01 Exam Preparation Material | AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01)

Prepare for the Amazon DEA-C01 with reliable study materials, practice questions, and key exam insights.

Prepare for the Amazon DEA-C01 AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) exam with CertQueen's independently developed study resources. Review important concepts, practice scenario-based questions, and use clear explanations to identify areas that require further study.

Question#1

A company stores details about transactions in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company wants to log all writes to the S3 bucket into another S3 bucket that is in the same AWS Region.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational effort?

A. Configure an S3 Event Notifications rule for all activities on the transactions S3 bucket to invoke an AWS Lambda function. Program the Lambda function to write the event to Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose. Configure Kinesis Data Firehose to write the event to the logs S3 bucket.
B. Create a trail of management events in AWS CloudTrai
C. Configure the trail to receive data from the transactions S3 bucket. Specify an empty prefix and write-only events. Specify the logs S3 bucket as the destination bucket.
D. Configure an S3 Event Notifications rule for all activities on the transactions S3 bucket to invoke an AWS Lambda function. Program the Lambda function to write the events to the logs S3 bucket.
E. Create a trail of data events in AWS CloudTrai
F. Configure the trail to receive data from the transactions S3 bucket. Specify an empty prefix and write-only events. Specify the logs S3 bucket as the destination bucket.

Explanation:
This solution meets the requirement of logging all writes to the S3 bucket into another S3 bucket with the least operational effort. AWS CloudTrail is a service that records the API calls made to AWS services, including Amazon S3. By creating a trail of data events, you can capture the details of the requests that are made to the transactions S3 bucket, such as the requester, the time, the IP address, and the response elements. By specifying an empty prefix and write-only events, you can filter the data events to only include the ones that write to the bucket. By specifying the logs S3 bucket as the destination bucket, you can store the CloudTrail logs in another S3 bucket that is in the same AWS Region. This solution does not require any additional coding or configuration, and it is more scalable and reliable than using S3 Event Notifications and Lambda functions.
Reference: Logging Amazon S3 API calls using AWS CloudTrail
Creating a trail for data events
Enabling Amazon S3 server access logging

Question#2

An ecommerce company collects daily customer transaction logs in CSV format and stores the logs in Amazon S3. The company uses Amazon Athena to scan a subset of attributes from the logs on the same day the company receives each log.
Query times are increasing because of increasing transaction volume. The company wants to improve query performance.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the SHORTEST query times?

A. Convert the CSV logs into multiple ORC files for better parallelism in Athena. Partition by date in Amazon S3. Use columnar pushdown filters.
B. Convert the CSV logs to JSO
C. Partition by date in Amazon S3. Use Athena with dynamic filtering to reduce data scans.
D. Convert the CSV logs to Avro. Partition by date in Amazon S3. Use Athena with projection-based partitioning.
E. Convert the CSV logs to a single Apache Parquet file for each day. Partition the data by date in Amazon S3. Use Athena with predicate pushdown filters.

Explanation:
Amazon Athena achieves the fastest query performance when data is stored in columnar formats such as Apache Parquet and when queries can take advantage of partition pruning and predicate pushdown.
Converting CSV files to Parquet significantly reduces the amount of data scanned because Parquet stores data in a column-oriented layout. Since Athena queries only a subset of attributes, it reads only the required columns instead of scanning entire rows, which dramatically improves performance. Predicate pushdown further reduces query time by filtering data at the storage layer.
Partitioning the data by date ensures that Athena scans only the relevant partitions for same-day queries, minimizing unnecessary data reads. Storing one Parquet file per day is efficient and avoids the overhead of managing excessive small files.
ORC is also a columnar format, but Parquet is more commonly optimized and recommended for Athena workloads in AWS exam guidance. JSON and Avro are row-based or semi-row-based formats and result in larger scan sizes and slower query execution.
Therefore, Option D provides the shortest query times and aligns with Athena performance best practices.

Question#3

A gaming company uses AWS Glue to perform read and write operations on Apache Iceberg tables for real-time streaming data. The data in the Iceberg tables is stored in Apache Parquet format. The company is experiencing slow query performance.
Which solutions will improve query performance? (Select TWO)

A. Use AWS Glue Data Catalog to generate column-level statistics for the Iceberg tables on a schedule.
B. Use AWS Glue Data Catalog to automatically compact the Iceberg tables.
C. Use AWS Glue Data Catalog to automatically optimize indexes for the Iceberg tables.
D. Use AWS Glue Data Catalog to enable copy-on-write for the Iceberg tables.
E. Use AWS Glue Data Catalog to generate views for the Iceberg tables.

Explanation:
Apache Iceberg query performance depends heavily on metadata optimization and file layout efficiency. Generating column-level statistics allows query engines such as AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and Amazon Redshift to perform predicate pushdown and data skipping. These statistics help avoid scanning unnecessary Parquet files and significantly reduce query execution time.
Real-time streaming workloads often generate many small files, which degrades query performance. Table compaction consolidates small Parquet files into fewer, larger files, improving scan efficiency and reducing metadata overhead. Iceberg supports compaction as a core optimization technique, and Glue can schedule these operations automatically.
Iceberg does not use traditional indexes, so index optimization is not applicable. Copy-on-write affects write semantics and consistency, not query speed. Views do not improve physical query performance.
Therefore, generating statistics and compacting files are the two most effective optimizations.

Question#4

A company needs to use an AWS Glue PySpark job to read specific data from an Amazon DynamoDB table. The company knows the partition key values for the required records. The existing processing logic of the AWS Glue PySpark job requires the data to be in DynamicFrame format. The company needs a solution to ensure that the job reads only the specified data.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the MINIMUM number of read capacity units (RCUs)?

A. Use the AWS Glue DynamoDB ETL connector to read the DynamoDB table. Use the filter option to read the required partition key.
B. Perform a query on the DynamoDB table in the AWS Glue job by using only the sort key in the key condition expression. Load the data into a DynamicFrame.
C. Perform a scan on the DynamoDB table in the AWS Glue job. Put the data into a DynamicFrame. Filter the DynamicFrame on the partition key.
D. Perform a query on the DynamoDB table in the AWS Glue job. Use the partition key in the key condition expression. Put the data into a DynamicFrame.

Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is optimized for Query operations, which retrieve items efficiently using the partition key and optionally the sort key. Queries consume significantly fewer RCUs than Scan operations because only matching partitions are read.
By performing a Query using the partition key in the key condition expression, the AWS Glue job reads only the required items directly from DynamoDB. This minimizes the number of read capacity units consumed and avoids unnecessary reads.
Using a Scan operation, even when followed by filtering in a DynamicFrame, consumes RCUs for the entire table or index and is highly inefficient. Using only the sort key in a query is invalid without the partition key and would not meet DynamoDB query requirements. The Glue DynamoDB connector filter option still performs a scan under the hood and does not minimize RCUs.
The queried data can be directly loaded into a DynamicFrame, satisfying the existing processing logic requirement without additional transformations.
Therefore, Option D provides the most efficient and cost-effective solution.

Question#5

A company uses Amazon S3 buckets, AWS Glue tables, and Amazon Athena as components of a data lake. Recently, the company expanded its sales range to multiple new states. The company wants to introduce state names as a new partition to the existing S3 bucket, which is currently partitioned by date.
The company needs to ensure that additional partitions will not disrupt daily synchronization between the AWS Glue Data Catalog and the S3 buckets.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

A. Use the AWS Glue API to manually update the Data Catalog.
B. Run an MSCK REPAIR TABLE command in Athena.
C. Schedule an AWS Glue crawler to periodically update the Data Catalog.
D. Run a REFRESH TABLE command in Athena.

Explanation:
Scheduling an AWS Glue crawler to periodically update the Data Catalog automates the process of detecting new partitions and updating the catalog, which minimizes manual maintenance and operational overhead.

Exam Code: Amazon DEA-C01
Q & A: 294 Q&As         Updated:  Oct 17,2026

 

 Access Complete Amazon DEA-C01 Preparation Material

What This Amazon DEA-C01 Study Resource Helps You Do

Review Key Concepts

Review the technologies, products, processes, and practical skills covered by the current Amazon DEA-C01 exam objectives.

Practice Scenario-Based Questions

Work through independently developed questions designed to strengthen your understanding of technical scenarios and decision-making.

Identify Knowledge Gaps

Use your results and the provided explanations to find weaker areas and focus your study more effectively.

How to Use This Amazon DEA-C01 Preparation Material

Review the Exam Scope

Start by reviewing the topics covered by the Amazon DEA-C01 exam. Compare them with the official exam objectives to understand the required technologies, operational tasks, and practical skills, then identify the areas that deserve the most attention.

Practice Independently

Complete a focused set of practice questions for each topic. On your first attempt, avoid referring to notes, answers, or other study resources so that you can evaluate your current understanding more accurately.

Study the Explanations

Review the answers and explanations after completing each practice session. Understand why the correct option is appropriate for the given scenario and why the other options may be incorrect or less suitable.

Close Knowledge Gaps

Keep track of incorrect answers, unfamiliar concepts, and weaker knowledge areas. Review these topics using official documentation and practical experience, then answer the related questions again to reinforce your understanding and monitor your progress.

Independent Amazon DEA-C01 Preparation Resource

CertQueen independently develops its certification study materials for educational purposes. The practice questions are not copied from, recalled from, or presented as live or official exam questions.

CertQueen is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, or authorized by any certification provider. Certification names, exam codes, product names, and related trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are referenced only for identification and educational purposes.