L6M1 Exam Preparation Material | Strategic Ethical Leadership

A. Assessing Readiness for Change and Decision-Making: Fred’s Approach as Head of Procurement
Fred’s recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department’s readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.

A. Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Intro C what is it
P1 C what makes up the informal organisation. Example
P2 C positive
P3 C negative
Conclusion C organisations need to appreciate its existence, harness the positive (communication and helping each other) but mitigate the bad (cliques and rumours).
Example Essay
The "Informal Organization" refers to the unofficial, and often spontaneous network of relationships, interactions, and communication that develop among employees within an organization. It exists alongside the formal structure and hierarchy of the organization, which is usually defined by the organizational chart, job roles, and official reporting relationships. The informal organization, on the other hand, is not documented or officially sanctioned but plays a significant role in shaping the work environment and influencing how work gets done.
The informal organisation is composed of: social networking (informal groups of friends), the Grapevine (informal messages, rumours) and collective values (groups making assumptions C familiarity breeds contempt). An example of this may be employees from different departments who routinely have lunch together and ‘gossip’ about the company. The Informal Organization exists in all types of organisation, regardless of the formal structure and it can have both positive and negative impacts on an organization:
Positive Impact:
Enhanced Communication: Informal networks often facilitate communication and information flow that might be limited within the formal structure. Employees can share ideas, solutions, and concerns more freely, leading to increased innovation and problem-solving.
Rapid Response to Change: Informal groups can adapt quickly to changes in the work environment, helping employees cope with uncertainty and transitions. They can be valuable during times of crisis or when the organization needs to pivot.
Social Support: Informal relationships can provide emotional support and a sense of belonging, reducing workplace stress and improving employee morale and job satisfaction. This can lead to higher retention rates and productivity. This is particularly true when activities or hobbies are included, for example a group of colleagues who create a football league and play after work.
Knowledge Transfer: Informal networks often facilitate the transfer of tacit knowledge (knowledge that is not easily documented) among employees, helping with onboarding, skill development, and organizational learning. For example, a more senior employee telling a new starter that Client A is a hothead so to make sure you answer his emails first.
Problem Resolution: Employees within informal networks may assist each other in resolving work-related issues, leading to quicker problem resolution and improved overall efficiency.
Negative Impact:
Cliques and Exclusivity: Informal groups can sometimes lead to cliques or exclusionary behaviour, which may create a sense of favouritism or inequality. This can negatively impact morale and teamwork.
For example if the manager plays in the football league mentioned above he may consciously or unconsciously pick someone else who plays football for a promotion.
Resistance to Change: In some cases, informal groups may resist organizational changes that threaten their established norms or power dynamics, hindering the implementation of necessary reforms.
Gossip and Rumours: Informal communication can lead to the spreading of rumours, misinformation, or negative perceptions, which can harm employee morale and create a culture of distrust.
Conflict and Discord: Informal networks can sometimes breed conflicts and rivalries, which may spill over into the formal organization and disrupt teamwork and productivity. This may be those who play football vs those who don’t.
Lack of Accountability: In the absence of clear reporting structures, the informal organization can undermine accountability, as individuals may not be held responsible for their actions or decisions.
In summary, the informal organization can have a significant impact on an organization, both positive and negative. Understanding and managing these informal dynamics is essential for creating a productive and harmonious work environment. The organisation should foster a culture of inclusivity and diversity to reduce the formation of cliques and utilise informal networks for knowledge sharing and employee engagement initiatives.
Tutor Notes
- The football example is from my own personal experience. Another example is a split between people who go for a drink after work and those who don't.
- Informal organisations is on p. 250 of the study guide. It came up as a topic in May 22 but that was about how it can impact change, specifically. So you could get a question like the above on pros and cons. Or a question with a case study.
- I love this quote: "Gossip is just the news wearing a tutu." ― Barbara Kingsolver. I think it perfectly
sums up the informal organisation. It’s communication channels and relationships, just in a tutu.

A. Introduction
Leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the procurement function within an organization, influencing strategic decisions, supplier relationships, and overall operational efficiency. One of the most impactful leadership styles is Visionary Leadership, characterized by the ability to inspire, motivate, and guide an organization toward a long-term strategic vision. In the context of procurement, where efficiency, cost management, ethical sourcing, and supplier collaboration are critical, the suitability of a visionary leader can significantly impact the success of procurement strategies.
This essay assesses the suitability of the Visionary Leadership Style in procurement by exploring its characteristics, advantages, challenges, and its impact on various aspects of procurement functions.
Understanding Visionary Leadership
A visionary leader is someone who has a clear and compelling vision of the future and possesses the ability to motivate teams and stakeholders to work towards achieving that vision. This leadership style is associated with strategic foresight, innovation, adaptability, and strong communication skills. Visionary leaders focus on long-term goals rather than short-term fixes and inspire procurement teams to align their objectives with the broader mission of the organization.
Key Characteristics of Visionary Leadership
Strategic Foresight C The ability to anticipate future trends, risks, and opportunities in procurement and supply chain management.
Inspirational Communication C The ability to effectively convey a vision, ensuring team members and stakeholders are aligned with procurement strategies.
Adaptability and Innovation C Encouraging new technologies, digital procurement solutions, and sustainable sourcing practices.
People-Centric Approach C Focusing on team empowerment, supplier collaboration, and ethical procurement practices.
Long-Term Focus C Prioritizing sustainability, strategic supplier partnerships, and risk mitigation over short-term cost-cutting measures.
The Suitability of Visionary Leadership in Procurement

A. Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Divide into two separate answers
1) Internal changes; personnel, systems, structure. External changes; STEEPLED and Porter C legislation, economy, technology, competitors.
2) Intro: what is a forcefield analysis? Explain how to do one. Then How can it help? Define objectives, impact on communication strategy
Example Essay
Change is a constant in the business world, and organizations must adapt to various internal and external forces to remain competitive and relevant. Understanding the sources of change is crucial for managing transformations effectively. In this essay, we will explore the distinction between internal and external sources of change and discuss how they impact personnel, processes, and company structure.
Sources of Internal Change within a Business:
People Changes: Changes in personnel, such as hiring, firing, promotions, and retirements, can have a profound impact on an organization. New hires may require training and onboarding, potentially affecting productivity during the transition. Terminations or layoffs may lead to temporary disruptions and workload adjustments for remaining employees. Moreover personnel changes can influence the organization's culture. New employees may bring different values and perspectives, while the loss of experienced employees can result in a shift in the workplace culture. Promotions and changes in leadership positions can influence decision-making, team dynamics, and the overall direction of the organization.
Systems Changes: Implementing or modifying systems, including software, technology, or operational procedures, can significantly affect how an organization operates. Well-planned systems changes can lead to increased operational efficiency, reduced errors, and improved decision-making, but employees may need time to adapt to new systems, potentially causing a temporary decrease in productivity. Moreover, systems changes can impact data storage, retrieval, and analysis, influencing how information is utilized within the organization.
Company Structure Changes: Altering the organization's structure, including hierarchies, departments, or reporting lines, can reshape how work is organized and executed. Employees who experience shifts in job roles, responsibilities, or reporting relationships, can affect job satisfaction and performance. It may also require adjustments in communication processes, potentially impacting the flow of information within the organization. A well-designed company structure can enhance efficiency and adaptability, while a poorly structured one may lead to inefficiencies and bureaucracy.
Sources of External Change Impacting a Business:
Legislation Changes: Changes in laws and regulations can have immediate and long-term consequences for businesses. Adapting to new regulations may require financial investments in compliance measures, training, or legal counsel. Businesses may need to modify processes and practices to ensure adherence to updated legal requirements. Companies that can proactively adapt to legislative changes may gain a competitive advantage by being compliant and avoiding penalties. An example of this is the upcoming changes to Public Sector Procurement Regulations which will take place in 2024, following the UK’s departure from the EU.
Economic Changes: Economic shifts, such as recessions, inflation, or economic growth, can affect an organization's financial health and market position. Economic downturns can lead to decreased consumer spending and reduced revenue, requiring cost-cutting measures like layoffs or budget
reductions. Conversely economic growth can present new market opportunities, prompting expansion, product diversification, or investment in research and development. Economic fluctuations can also disrupt supply chains, affecting inventory management, pricing, and delivery times.
Technological Changes: Rapid advancements in technology can drive changes in how businesses operate and compete. Embracing technological advancements can enhance operational efficiency, reduce costs, and improve customer experiences. Employees may require training to adapt to new technologies, and organizations may need to invest in digital infrastructure. Technology-driven innovations can disrupt traditional industries and create new competitive threats or opportunities. For example the music industry has seen huge changes in the past 10 years due to the increasing popularity of streaming platforms such as Apple Music and Spotify.
Competitor Actions: Actions taken by competitors, such as new product launches, marketing campaigns, or market entries, can influence an organization's market share and strategy. This may require adjustments in pricing, product offerings, or marketing strategies. An organisation should look at Porter’s 5 Forces and STEEPLE analysis to fully understand potential external sources of change.
In the dynamic business environment, both internal and external sources of change play significant roles in shaping organizations. Recognizing these sources of change and effectively managing them are essential for organizations to succeed.
Forcefield Analysis
Lewin's Force Field Analysis is a valuable tool that can help a leader plan for change by providing a structured framework for understanding the forces at play in an organization when considering a change initiative. Developed by psychologist Kurt Lewin in 1951, this model helps leaders assess the driving forces that promote change and the restraining forces that resist it.
Identifying Driving and Restraining Forces:
Driving Forces: These are factors that push for change and support the desired change initiative. Identifying these forces helps leaders understand what is propelling the organization toward change. Examples of driving forces include market opportunities, customer demands, and performance improvement goals.
Restraining Forces: These are factors that oppose or hinder change. Recognizing these forces is crucial as they represent obstacles that need to be addressed or overcome. Restraining forces can include employee resistance, existing processes, or budget constraints.
Assessing the Balance:
After identifying driving and restraining forces, leaders can assess the balance between them. This analysis provides a clear picture of the overall readiness for change within the organization. If driving forces outweigh restraining forces, it suggests a favourable environment for change, while an
imbalance in the other direction may require more effort to gain buy-in and overcome resistance.
Prioritizing Action Steps:
Once the forces are identified and their balance is assessed, leaders can prioritize action steps accordingly. For driving forces, leaders can focus on leveraging them further and ensuring that they continue to support the change. For restraining forces, strategies can be developed to mitigate or overcome them. This may involve addressing concerns, providing training, or reallocating resources.
How this can help a leader plan for change:
Force Field Analysis provides a foundation for developing a comprehensive change management plan. Leaders can use the insights gained to structure the plan, including defining specific objectives, timelines, and key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure progress.
Understanding the forces at play allows leaders to tailor their communication and engagement strategies. They can target communication efforts toward addressing the concerns and motivations of employees, stakeholders, and other relevant parties. By addressing restraining forces through effective communication, leaders can build support for the change.
The analysis doesn't end with the initiation of change; it continues throughout the change process. Leaders can continuously monitor the balance of forces and adjust their strategies as needed. If new restraining forces emerge or driving forces weaken, the change plan can be adapted accordingly to maintain momentum.
In summary, Lewin's Force Field Analysis provides leaders with a structured approach to understanding the dynamics of change within an organization. By identifying driving and restraining forces, leaders can better plan, execute, and manage change initiatives, ultimately increasing the likelihood of successful implementation and achieving desired outcomes.
Tutor Notes
- I have split my answers here and clearly signposted this to the examiner. A top tip is to consider the examiner’s first look at your essay. By doing this, they can clearly see within the first 10 seconds that I’ve understood the question and I’ve answered all parts. It’s a way to set yourself up for success. So, use all the headings and spacings you can. I don’t think you can use bold in the exam, but you could use capital letters instead.
- A way to improve on the above would be to give more examples. For the Forcefield analysis you could talk about a potential change at company X being the introduction of a new product line, and say what the forces for and against would be. This would really hammer-home to the examiner you know your stuff.
- Sources of change C p. 224 (note the study guide says internal sources are people, structure and processes, I used the word system in my essay above rather than processes but it’s the same thing).
External sources of change are anything from STEEPLED and Porter. Remember the question is only worth 10 points, so 3 or 4 internal and 3 or 4 internal is more than enough. Don’t do a full STEEPLED. You don’t have time.
- Forcefield analysis is p. 232

A. Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Intro C explain which three; minimum wage, working hours, H&S
P1 C minimum wage
P2 C working hours
P3 C H&S
Conclusion C law is always evolving
Example Essay
Employment law in the United Kingdom has evolved over the years to safeguard the rights and interests of employees while providing a framework for fair and equitable employment practices. This essay delves into three crucial areas of employment law: minimum wage, working hours, and health and safety.
Minimum Wage. The National Minimum Wage Act 1998 and subsequent amendments established the legal framework for minimum wage rates in the UK. The current legislation sets different minimum wage rates for various age groups. Currently (2023) for those aged 23 and over the minimum wage is £10.42 per hour. This is rising to £11 in 2024. Younger workers will earn less, with those on an apprenticeship, considerably less. Minimum wage legislation has significantly improved the earnings of low-paid workers and reduced income inequality. It ensures that employees receive a fair wage for their labour, promoting economic stability and social well-being.
Interestingly, not all countries have a minimum wage or set it hourly. For example in Spain, minimum wage is set out monthly (around 1000 euros/ month). Sweden doesn’t have a minimum wage at all. Sweden relies on collective bargaining agreements negotiated between employers and labour unions to determine wage rates and employment conditions. These agreements are sector-specific and cover a wide range of industries, effectively setting minimum wage standards at the industry level rather than through legislation. This approach allows for flexibility and tailoring of wage rates to different sectors of the economy but also means that minimum wage levels can vary depending on the specific collective agreement in place within a given industry.
Working Hours: The Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) and the EU Working Time Directive establish legal limits on working hours, rest breaks, and paid leave for workers in the UK. The WTR also introduced the concept of the "opt-out," allowing workers to voluntarily exceed the 48-hour weekly working time limit. Working time regulations promote work-life balance, protect employees from excessive working hours, and enhance health and well-being. The "opt-out" provision provides flexibility but must be implemented with respect to workers' rights. It is common in the UK for Junior Doctors to opt out to ensure they have enough time to complete their training within a specific timeframe. Some training programs require a certain number of hours or procedures to be completed during a specific period. Another reason for opting out is the opportunity to earn more money, particularly if overtime is paid at a high rate.
Health and Safety: The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 is the cornerstone of health and safety legislation in the UK. It places duties on employers to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of their employees, as well as others affected by their work activities. Specific regulations, such as the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, provide additional guidance. One of the main areas this legislation covers is the importance of completing risk assessments. The case of R v. Tangerine Confectionery Ltd (2018) emphasized the importance of risk assessments in preventing workplace accidents. The company was fined for failing to adequately assess the risk of an employee's arm getting trapped in a machine, resulting in serious injury. Health and Safety legislation has led to safer workplaces, reduced accident rates, and improved employee well-being. Employers are legally obligated to identify and mitigate workplace risks, ensuring the protection of their workforce.
In conclusion, UK employment law, encompassing minimum wage, working hours, and health and safety, plays a pivotal role in safeguarding employees' rights, promoting fair labour practices, and ensuring safe working environments. As employment dynamics continue to evolve, it is imperative that employment law remains adaptable, responsive, and protective of employees in an ever-changing work landscape.