Is it difficult for you to decide to purchase Nutanix NCP-MCI-6.10 exam dumps questions? CertQueen provides FREE online Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI v6.10) NCP-MCI-6.10 exam questions below, and you can test your NCP-MCI-6.10 skills first, and then decide whether to buy the full version or not. We promise you get the following advantages after purchasing our NCP-MCI-6.10 exam dumps questions. 1.Free update in ONE year from the date of your purchase. 2.Full payment fee refund if you fail NCP-MCI-6.10 exam with the dumps
Latest NCP-MCI-6.10 Exam Dumps Questions
The dumps for NCP-MCI-6.10 exam was last updated on Mar 16,2026 .
Viewing page 1 out of 5 pages.
Viewing questions 1 out of 25 questions
An administrator is managing a 4-node cluster with different hardware generations: Two G5 Nodes → 2 CPUs (12 cores), 1 SSD (1.92 TB), 2 HDDs (4 TB). Two G7 Nodes → 2 CPUs (16 cores), 2 SSDs (1.92 TB), 4 HDDs (4 TB). The cluster will be decommissioned from production and used for Disaster Recovery (DR) purposes with an RPO of 1 hour. What is the best approach when replacing G5 nodes without impacting performance?
Explanation: For optimal Disaster Recovery performance, new nodes must match or exceed the storage performance of existing nodes. Option A (New node must have at least 2 SSDs) is correct: Since the G7 nodes have two SSDs, replacing G5 nodes with at least 2 SSDs ensures consistent SSD cache and performance. Option B is incorrect: G7 or G8 nodes may help, but storage performance is more critical for DR. Option C is incorrect: CPU core count does not impact DR storage performance as much as SSD capacity. Option D is incorrect: Hybrid nodes are already in use, but SSDs must match for performance balance. Reference: Nutanix Hardware Guide → Choosing Nodes for Hybrid and DR Clusters Nutanix KB → Balancing Storage Across Different Hardware Generations
An administrator has been tasked by the company's leadership to justify and explain the decision to utilize the new Nutanix Disaster Recovery solution. The environment contains: • 100 workloads • Workloads have varying boot orders • Workloads span multiple subnets • Workloads span across different business units How should the administrator most efficiently organize and manage the workloads?
Explanation: Nutanix Categories allow administrators to group related VMs, making Disaster Recovery (DR) planning easier. Option B (Utilize Categories to organize VMs in Recovery Plans) is correct: Categories help group VMs based on application tiers (e.g., database, middleware, web servers). This ensures orderly failover while maintaining application dependencies. Option A (Naming schema) is incorrect: Naming conventions help, but they do not provide functional organization in recovery plans. Option C (1:10 Recovery Plan to VMs) is incorrect: The ratio depends on business requirements, not a fixed number. Option D (RESTful APIs) is incorrect: Automation is useful, but it does not replace proper VM grouping via categories. Reference: Nutanix Disaster Recovery Guide → Using Categories for DR Management Nutanix KB → Organizing VMs for Disaster Recovery Planning
An administrator needs to ensure that a VM is powered on before the rest of the VMs when starting a host. Which configuration option allows this behavior?
Explanation: High Availability (HA) in Nutanix provides priority-based VM restart capabilities to ensure that certain VMs are powered on before others in the event of a host reboot or failure. Option C (High Availability) is correct: Nutanix HA policies allow administrators to prioritize VM startup order to ensure that critical services (such as database VMs or management VMs) are available before others. Option A (Recovery Plan) is incorrect: Recovery Plans are used in Disaster Recovery (DR) scenarios and do not control boot order during normal host restarts. Option B (Host Affinity) is incorrect: Host Affinity is used to keep a VM pinned to a specific host, but it does not control boot sequencing. Option D (Agent VM) is incorrect: Agent VMs (such as Witness VMs) are specialized virtual machines used for Metro Availability, not general boot priority settings. Reference: Nutanix Prism Element Guide → Configuring HA Reservation and VM Priority Nutanix Bible → High Availability (HA) and VM Failover Nutanix KB → VM Restart Priority in High Availability Configurations
An administrator has configured Metro Availability but a few hours later got an NCC warning: Node x.x.X.X: WARN: Break replication timeout of Metro protection domain 'M1' is below the recommended minimum. What is a possible resolution for this issue?
An administrator wants to ensure that user VMs on AHV hosts can take advantage of bandwidth beyond a single adapter in a bond. Which uplink Bond Type should the administrator configure to accomplish this?
Explanation: Active-Active bonding allows multiple network interfaces to be used simultaneously, improving bandwidth and redundancy. Option B (Active-Active) is correct: This mode enables load balancing across all available adapters, providing higher throughput and fault tolerance. Option A (No Uplink Bond) is incorrect: Without a bond, VMs cannot benefit from multiple adapters. Option C (Active-Active with MAC pinning) is incorrect: MAC pinning binds traffic to a single NIC, limiting bandwidth distribution. Option D (Active-Backup) is incorrect: This mode only provides failover, not increased bandwidth. Reference: Nutanix AHV Networking Guide → Bonding Modes and Load Balancing Nutanix KB → Optimizing Network Throughput in AHV
Exam Code: NCP-MCI-6.10 Q & A: 121 Q&As Updated: Mar 16,2026
